The Project Gutenberg eBook of Ohio Journal of Science November, Volume XVI, 1915, Number 1, by Ohio State University.

Subscription Price: $2.00 per Year, payable in advance; to Foreign Countries, $2.50.

The Ohio Journal of Science is owned and controlled by the Ohio State University Scientific Society. By a special arrangement with the Ohio Academy of Science, the Ohio Journal of Science is sent without additional expense to all members of the Academy who are not in arrears for annual dues.

The first fifteen volumes of the old Ohio Naturalist may be obtained at $1.00 per volume.

Remittances of all kinds should be made payable to the Business Manager, J. S. Hine.

Fifteen years ago the Biological Club of the Ohio State University began publishing The Ohio Naturalist. This Journal has had a continuous existence and has been an important medium in advancing the knowledge of the natural history of the state. A number of years ago the Naturalist became the official organ of the Ohio Academy of Science and was thus sent to every member of the Academy. At that time the Ohio Academy was largely composed of Biologists and Geologists, but has now widened its scope to include Physicists, Mathematicians, and others. It was, therefore, thought desirable by many that the scope of the Naturalist should be enlarged so as to make it representative of all of the activities of the Academy. In accordance with this desire, committees were appointed by the various departments interested and a plan for future publication was proposed which was finally adopted.

The Ohio State University Scientific Society was thus organized at the Ohio State University and will take over the control of the new publication. This Society is to have somewhat the same relationship to The Ohio Journal of Science as the Biological Club had to the Ohio Naturalist. The management of the Journal is under an Editorial Board made up of representatives of various scientific departments of the University. This Board elects annually the Editor and two Associate Editors. [2]

Agricultural Chemistry, J. F. Lyman; Agricultural Engineering, F. W. Ives; Agronomy, A. G. McCall; Anatomy, F. L. Landacre; Botany, J. H. Schaffner; Ceramic Engineering, Carl B. Harrop; Chemistry, Jas. R. Withrow; Civil Engineering, F. H. Eno; Forestry, N. W. Scherer; Geology, C. S. Prosser; Horticulture, V. H. Davis; Industrial Arts, W. A. Knight; Mathematics, C. J. West; Mechanical Engineering, Horace Judd; Pathology, Jonathan Forman; Physics, F. C. Blake; Physiology (General) R. J. Seymour; Physiology (Medical), Clayton McPeek; Public Health and Sanitation, E. R. Hayhurst; Zoology and Entomology, J. S. Hine.

The Ohio Journal of Science is to be considered as a continuation of The Ohio Naturalist. It is hoped that with the wider field covered, it may interest a much larger number of the scientific people of the state, and be financially supported so that it may soon develop into a journal of high standard. It is the intention of the present Editors, with the large field before them, to publish results of research as well as articles of general interest in the advancement of Science. On the natural history side the aim at present will be to pay more especial attention to the biology, geology and geography of Ohio, but articles dealing with any other region will be acceptable.

Photography, in its more serious phase, has taken an important place in almost every field of human activity while in its lighter mood, through the development of the “Kodak” and the roll film, is giving us one of our most delightful pastimes. As a condition for the best work, a high grade lens is a necessity and especially so for those extremely short exposures required in the photography of rapidly moving objects. It often happens that some of the most perfect and at the same time most difficult specimens of optical design are found on cameras so small that they can be easily carried in one’s coat pocket. These so called anastigmats furnish to the optician a difficult and yet at the same time most fascinating problem for mathematical investigation. Thousands of photographic objectives are placed on the market every year, yet though almost every branch of engineering is covered by our technical schools, I know of no place outside of Germany where a student can be instructed in the design and construction of a simple photographic objective. Professor Silvanus P. Thompson in his inaugural address as President of the British Optical Convention held in London in 1912, states: “In the Universities and Colleges the only people who are learning Optics are merely taking it as a part of Physics for the sake of passing an examination for a degree, and care nothing for the application of Optics in the industries. They are being taught Optics by men who are not opticians, who never ground a lens or calculated even an achromatic doublet, who never worked an opthalmoscope or measured a cylindrical lens.” Further on he speaks as follows: “What is wanted is an establishment where the whole atmosphere is one of optical interest; where theory and practice go hand in hand; where the mathematician will himself grind lenses and measure their performance on the test bench; where braincraft will be married to handcraft; where precision, whether in computation or workmanship, will be the dominating ambition.” [4]

Some four years before the above quotations were written, the author started to work up a course in Optics which should aim, not only to give to the student a knowledge of the fundamental theory of lenses, but should also apply those principles to the methods of optical design and thus enable him to compute the curves of the component lenses of a photographic objective. This has now been fairly well worked out and is given in the Arts college under the official titles “Astronomy, 107, 108, 109 and 110.” The basis of this course is “A System of Applied Optics,” by H. Dennis Taylor, the inventor of the Cooke lens. This splendid volume develops, from the standpoint of geometric optics, a complete discussion of the formation of an image by a combination of any number of lenses, but does not apply the methods and formulae there developed to the actual design of a photographic objective. The writer of this paper was, therefore, compelled to work out this part of the theory for himself and, as he had always felt that all mathematics should ultimately end in arithmetic and that all arithmetic should ultimately end in doing something, he resolved at the outset that the course should end in laboratory work in the actual computation, grinding and polishing of lenses. As to how well this has succeeded, I will let the illustrations which accompany this article speak for themselves. Suffice it to say that the half tone cuts were made from five by seven enlargements from negatives, one and three quarters by two and one-eighth inches, taken with a lens designed and built at this observatory and working at an aperture of F six. A peculiar feature of this lens is that it is composed of four lenses all cut from the same piece of crown glass. This lens beautifully illustrates the importance of adding to the theoretical side of the course, the practical work in the laboratory in construction and testing as this lens, though in the main satisfactory, has one serious defect and a defect which is very instructive in that it shows that at a certain point in the design, the theory was weak and needed to be extended and enlarged. It should be stated that this theoretical investigation is now completed and ready to be put to the test of practice. [5]

This Observatory possesses a well equipped instrument shop, which was used for the practical side of this work and it has seemed to me that a description of how we used the ordinary tools of a machine shop, of what special appliances we were compelled to make, and how we finally ground and polished our lenses would be of general interest. These methods do not pretend to be the best, nor those actually employed by the manufacturer, but they do illustrate how a lens can be made and how a little ingenuity will enable one if he has the standard tools of a machine shop to carry out almost any kind of experimental work.

As a preliminary to this, a brief outline of the problem before the lens designer may be of interest. A simple lens consists of a piece of glass bounded by either plane or spherical surfaces as these, except in large reflecting surfaces, are the only kind that can be made with sufficient accuracy. Such a lens would have a great many defects or errors and would be unable to give a sharp image on the photographic plate unless stopped down to a very small aperture. By changing the radii of the surfaces, and the thickness of the lens, the designer can vary these errors, but after all is said and done he can do but little to improve the single lens. He then combines lenses of different forms and of different kinds of glass into a single objective, in this way making the positive errors of some of the lenses balance the negative errors of the others, until he arrives at a combination which is more or less perfect according to his skill as a designer. How this is accomplished is far beyond the limits of this paper, so I will now proceed to the mechanical side of the problem.

The first consideration is the glass; of course it must be what is known as optical glass and its selection is really part of the work of the designer. Optical glass is nothing more than a very perfect kind of glass which has been exquisitely annealed. You are all familiar with the intense green of window glass when seen edgewise; a piece of white paper will hardly be changed in color when seen through twelve inches of a good optical crown. The best optical glass is not made in this country, but must be purchased from either Schott & Gen. of Jena or Mantois of France. The Jena glass has become very celebrated and most of the lens makers state that their lenses are made out of it and as a consequence most people think that Jena glass means a certain kind, while, as a matter of fact, their catalogue for 1909 shows about seventy different varieties. These differ in optical qualities and chemical composition, and cost from about a dollar to five dollars a pound, with a few special varieties costing as much as fifteen dollars. This glass comes in slabs, but will be cut by the makers with either a diamond saw or a sand saw, the purchaser paying for the “saw dust.” [6]

The slabs that were used here were 2" × 6" × ½" and the first operation was to cut from these round disks a little larger than the finished lens. This was accomplished in the following manner and is illustrated in Fig. 1. In the chuck of a drill speeder on a Barnes drill press was placed a ¼" steel rod which carried at its lower end a copper tube, A, which was steadied at the bottom by a steel washer, bored to a loose fit to the tube, and clamped to the glass as shown. Number 40 Carborundum was used and lubricated with plenty of water. The tube must be lifted frequently to allow the abrasive to flow to the cutting edge. This is done so often that it seems almost a continuous motion of lifting and pressing down again, the tool resting on the glass hardly more than two or three seconds at a time. The cutting may be done at such a speed as to allow of a slight heating. As soon as the tube has cut itself about a sixteenth of an inch into the glass, the guiding [7] washer may be removed and the glass will then act as its own guide. A disk about one inch in diameter and a half of an inch thick could be cut out in a little over a half of an hour. At B Fig. 1 is shown one of the uncut slabs and at C and D two that are about used up. Though working rather slowly this proved quite satisfactory though wasteful of glass as it cut a rather wide scarf, copper must be used; brass was tried but the wear was so great as to render it almost useless while the copper shows almost none.

As these disks are cut out they are not only cone shaped but the edges are very rough so that the next operation was to grind these to smooth and true circular disks. This was done on a Wells tool grinder shown in Fig. 2, which was slowed way down by placing a large pulley on the counter shaft. The glass to be ground was held by cementing it with pitch onto a piece of brass rod which in turn was held in the drawing collet of the head A. A special wheel B, made by the Norton people for grinding the rims of spectacle lenses, was used and the machine slowed until the wheel would keep wet when running against a sponge, C, resting in water. The glass disk was in this way kept dripping and heating entirely prevented. The grinding was then carried out just as with any other material and the edge was made beautifully smooth and true in a few minutes. The beauty of pitch as a cement for holding the glass is that a slight heating will soften it so that the disk can be shifted to any position and then a dash of cold water clamps it in place and at the same time the pitch will slowly yield to the slightest pressure so that in a few minutes the glass is entirely free from strain. In manufacturing this sort of work is done with a diamond and is of course done much more quickly.

The disks were thick enough to make two lenses each so we sawed them into two as illustrated in Fig. 3. A is an old polishing head upon which was mounted a pulley at one end and a copper disk, B, at the other, the disk being held between large washers. C is a cast iron box fastened to an arm, D, hinged at E and kept pressed against the copper disk by a cord passing over two pulleys on the ceiling. This made a most excellent automatic feed. The glass to be split was fastened to a block of pine with pitch and the wood held in the iron box, C, with wedges. Number 40 Carborundum was used with [8] plenty of water and the glass was cut through faster than a power hack saw would cut through steel. The glass should be cut half way through and then reversed so that the final break will come in the middle and thus prevent the edges from spawling off. The chief defect of this machine was the way it scattered emery.

The disks are now ready for the grinding which is done on the machine on the right of Fig. 3, which consists simply of a vertical spindle run by a quarter twist belt from the counter shaft against the wall. The end of this spindle is tapered at the upper end to receive the grinding tool or laps, shown on the table in Fig. 5 which also shows the spindle raised so that the grinding lap is seen above the tin box, C, which surrounds the spindle to catch the abrasive that is thrown off in grinding. The glass is first smoothed down on a flat lap until it is of equal thickness at all points as measured by a micrometer when it is ready to be ground to the proper curves. For this purpose the spherical laps, shown in Fig. 5, are turned in the special machine illustrated in Fig. 4. The compound rest of an [9] old Seller’s lathe was removed and in its place, on the cross slide of the carriage, was mounted the sphere turning rest. This consists of a base, A, in which the slide, B, is so mounted that it can be rotated about the center, C, by turning the milled head, D, which carries a worm at the opposite end. E is the tool post with the cutting tool T and L the lap to be turned. A hole was drilled at C into which was fitted a round piece of steel the upper end being pointed and then half cut away like a center reamer. This was used in finding the zero; the rod, pointed end up, was placed in the hole at C and the cutting tool adjusted against the flattened side. The zero position is then determined by measuring, with an inside micrometer, the distance from the tool post to a stop placed at the end of the slide B. By adding to or subtracting from the zero reading of the micrometer the length of the radius of the grinding lap, the tool post may be set to the proper position for either a convex or a concave surface. This, however, is only approximate, for these laps must be made with the highest possible accuracy. After sufficient cuts have been taken to give a spherical surface, the radius is carefully measured with a special spherometer and the error in the radius corrected by changing the position of the cutting tool by an amount calculated from the readings of the spherometer. This spherometer we were compelled to build as we could find none of sufficient accuracy on the market and it is described in a note at the end of this article.

In Fig. 4, R is simply a steady rest made with the large overhang to allow the slide B to swing under it in turning a convex surface. Two master laps, male and female, must be made and carefully ground together. Every effort should be taken to make these as accurate as possible since upon these depends the goodness of our lens. This special tool is easy to make and leaves nothing to be desired in its operation. Detail drawings and directions for making it are given in a note at the end.

We now come to the grinding or lapping of the lenses themselves. This is done in a lap turned as above and carefully fitted to the master laps and which must be trued from time to time as the work progresses. This lapping of glass is entirely different from the lapping of metals in that, while in metals the lap is to be kept almost free from the abrasive, in glass the lap must be freely supplied with emery and water or deep scratches will result. The best way to apply the emery is with a paint brush; the brush, saturated with emery, being held in front of [11] the lens as it is ground. The lens may be held in the hand or cemented to a disk of brass having a center hole drilled in the back in which is placed a pointed piece of steel held in the hand, the lens being free to rotate about the pointed steel holder. Of course where the lens has to be ground to a definite thickness it must be held by hand. Flour of emery was used to rough grind though coarser grades would have worked faster. The final smooth grinding was done with a special fine emery made for this purpose by Bausch and Lomb. Great care must be taken in the grinding to keep the lens as nearly centered as possible. A lens is said to be centered when the line which joins the centers of curvature of the surfaces passes through the center of figure. Obviously if a double convex lens could be ground to a knife edge it would be centered but if this were done the edge would be almost certain to crumble in the final polishing and deep scratches result. The centering of a convex lens can be watched by keeping the edge as nearly uniform of thickness as possible with a concave lens, if the original blank is made larger than necessary and care is taken to make the sides parallel, the centering can be watched by keeping a flat edge of equal width around the concave portion, the lens being placed back on the flat tool, from time to time, as the work progresses. If care is used the lens need be made but little larger than the finished size to allow for the final accurate centering to be described later.

After being smooth ground the lens is beautifully smooth and velvety to the touch but is just as much ground glass as ever, that is, it is absolutely opaque. We now come to the polishing. This is done with specially prepared rouge and only an excessively small amount of glass is taken off. Lord Rayleigh in a paper on “Polishing of Glass Surfaces” read before the British Optical Convention held in 1905, states: “I started with a finely ground surface, rather more finely ground I think than is used in practice, and I found that in order to obtain a pretty good polish it was necessary to remove a weight of glass, corresponding to a depth of about 6 wavelengths. I do not pretend that such a polish would satisfy the requirements of commerce; probably the 6 would have to be raised to 10 or 12 in order to get to the bottom of the deepest pits.” When it is remembered that a wave length is about the fifty [12] thousandth part of an inch we realize how very delicate such lapping must be. For this work the lap is covered with pitch which has been brought to the proper degree of hardness either by boiling, to harden it or by adding asfalt varnish to soften it. The proper degree of hardness is very important and must be adjusted to the temperature of the room. Obviously if the pitch is too soft it will not hold its shape and it will be impossible to hold the polishing tool to the proper radius. I have put three different curves on a lens about an inch in diameter in a few minutes and it had to go back on the grinding machine before it could be finished.

The polishing tool is prepared as follows: A disk of pitch, about ¼" thick, is cast by pouring it in a mold made by a strip of brass bent to a circle, the ends clamped with a tool maker’s clamp, and rested on a piece of cold cast iron which has been planed smooth. This should be of such size that when bent to the proper shape it can be molded over a tool similar to the grinding tool but with a radius changed by about the thickness of the pitch. This tool is then heated and painted with a stick of pitch, the disk is warmed, and the two pressed together, when cooled the pitch will stick tight to the iron but will be far from a smooth surface. This and the master tool of the opposite curvature are placed in warm water and pressed together and at the same time one slowly rotated, one about the other. When a good fit is secured they are cooled and a number of small holes, about 1-8" in diameter, are drilled all over the pitch to distribute the abrasive, which of course spoils the surface and the tool must be again pressed. This pressing to shape must be done repeatedly and requires great care and some practice in order to have the pitch come to the exact opposite of the pressing tool. The most important thing is to do the pressing slowly and in fact in the whole process of this work one must never get in a hurry. Ritchey, in his memoir on the construction of the great 60" at Mt. Wilson, recommends covering the pitch with beeswax, and for quicker and poorer work a cloth polisher may be used, the cloth being a special felt and cemented to the cast iron tool with a thin layer of pitch.

The abrasive is rouge or red oxide of iron and its preparation is fully described in the above mentioned work by Ritchey. We purchased the anhydrous red oxide of iron from Merck & Co. This was mixed with plenty of water in the jars shown at E, Fig. 5. [13] The rouge will rapidly precipitate, the coarse particles falling to the bottom, and leaving clear water above the precipitated rouge. The upper two-thirds of the rouge will be almost perfect and will give a beautiful polish when carefully siphoned off. This should be kept in tightly corked bottles, one of the best things is a horse radish jar as this has a place for the handle of the brush in the glass stopper, and all dust and grit can be easily washed off before the jar is opened. For polishing, the lens is cemented to a handle at whose end is a piece of brass turned to fit the lens in the sphere turning machine already described. Even in a small lens the polishing tool must be run slowly, the speeds of our machines run from 170 to 300 revolutions per minute and the fastest can seldom be used. The reason of this is that the lens fits the polisher so perfectly that almost a perfect vacuum is formed and the lens hugs the polished so closely that it is impossible to hold it in small sizes by hand alone and in the case of a convex surface, if the cavity is carried clear out to the edge of the glass disk, this may be broken simply by the friction due to this grip of the glass and pitch. Fig. 5 shows a horizontal polishing head at B and a vertical one at C. There is little choice except that for convex surfaces B seems the best, as it can be run faster, while for concave C seems better.

The lenses are now ready to be centered, that is, the circumference so turned that the line which joins the centers of curvature of the two spherical surfaces shall pass through the center of figure. In order to accomplish this, the lens is first cleaned from the pitch used to cement it to the handle used in holding the lens for polishing. For a long time I could find no way of doing this satisfactorily when pitch was the cement; finally, I laid my troubles before Dr. A. M. Bleile, Head of the Department of Physiology, and he suggested to first soak the lens in lard and then wash it in benzol (C₆H₆). This worked like magic though the first time I tried it I used some lard that had been heated with some pitch in it which made the lard very soft in fact almost as soft as it could be and yet not be an oil, and this same lard was used over and over again. The action is rather peculiar; the lard does not apparently effect the pitch at all but after a few minutes in the benzene it all flakes off and leaves the lens perfectly clean. The actual centering is then carried out on the grinding machine shown in Fig. 2; A holder, D, whose front face has [14] been turned in the spherical turning machine to fit one of the surfaces of the lens, is held in the head A. If the lens be cemented to this with a thin coat of pitch, it is obvious that the surface of the lens next to the holder will have its center of curvature coincide with the axis of rotation of the spindle of the head, A, but the center of curvature of the other lens surface will probably fall outside of this axis. A lamp, L, has a tin chimney with a pin hole in it turned towards the lens, this pin hole forming a brilliant point of light, an image of which is formed by each surface and reflected by the total reflecting prism, P, into the telescope, T, where it is seen through the eyepiece. If the centers of curvature of both surfaces do not accurately coincide with the axis of rotation of the head, A, the images of the pin hole will describe circles as this axis is rotated. The back surface will of course be centered if the layer of the pitch used as cement is of uniform thickness which will generally be the case if the work has been carefully done; but in any case the image formed by it should be examined. If the front surface is out of center, as it generally will be, the holder should be warmed and the lens shifted, care being used to keep it tight against the surface of the holder as it is being shifted. As soon as both images remain stationary as the head, A, is rotated, the lens is fed against the wheel, B, and ground true and to size. This worked beautifully and the tests were wonderfully sensitive. As soon as the component lenses of the objective have all been thus centered, they are ready to be assembled in the cell or shutter in which they are to be used; but as this is simply a matter of careful machine work, I need not describe it further.

I know of no literature on the grinding of small lenses though the following memoirs on the making of large reflecting telescopes should be in the hands of any one interested in this work:

In Fig. 6, A is a regular Brown & Sharpe Micrometer Head with the measuring point ground to an angle of 60° and slightly rounded; B is a round steel base all machined at one setting in which the micrometer head is clamped by a set screw not shown.

Let r be the radius of the spherical surface, MNO, and we will have at once r = ^{(a² + d²)} ⁄ 2d. The advantage of this form of spherometer is that it is very easy to make the point of the micrometer exactly central with the base and the value of 2a can be accurately determined by means of an ordinary micrometer calliper. For a convex surface, 2a should obviously be the inside diameter of the base, B.

In using the instrument, two tables, one for concave and one for convex surfaces, should be prepared; these tables to give the power in dioptres for each one thousandth of an inch in the value of d. Using the American Optical Co.’s Standard Index, namely, μ equal to 1.5000 and one dioptre as being the power of a lens of 40 inches focus, we have, for a plano lens, p = ⁴⁰⁄_f = ^40d ⁄ (a² + d²) since f = ^r ⁄ (μ-1).

The advantage of forming the table in dioptres in place of radii directly is that the tabular differences are small at all parts of the table so that interpolation can be readily done and this is not the case in tables which give the radii directly.

If upon measuring the radius of the tool or lap being turned in the sphere turning machine, Fig. 4, with this spherometer, the tool is found to be in error by an amount Δp this may be corrected by changing the position of the cutting tool by an amount 20 (Δp ⁄ p²).

In Fig. 7 is shown a cross section of the sphere turning rest further illustrated in Fig. 4. In machining this the following suggestions should be followed. The piece M should be cast with a lug projecting from the face PQ to chuck it by and all the turning done at one chucking. It should be made a close fit to R and bolted tight against DG and ED´ with the bolts S₃ and S₄, clearance being given along the line HF. To compensate for ware the face DG and ED´ can be releaved from time to time with a file. The base N, should be planed along AB, where it fastens to the cross slide of the carriage, then bolted to a face plate of the lathe and finished, care being used to leave the setting of the compound rest unchanged between machining the faces CD and C´D´ of the pieces M and N. The dove tail on R should be first planed and then this bolted to a face plate and the boss GHFE and the faces KG and EL turned at one setting. If these directions are followed almost no hand work will be needed. W is a brass worm wheel held by screws not shown and J is the sliding tool post clamped at X with the tool at K´.

The following notes principally concerning North American Zygnemales are based on a study of the specimens accumulated in the course of eight years collecting in central Illinois; a collection made by Mr. Charles Bullard, of Cambridge, Mass., in Massachusetts and New Hampshire; the specimens distributed in the Phycotheca Boreali-Americana by Collins, Holden and Setchell; the specimens distributed in American Algae, by Miss Josephine E. Tilden; the specimens in the U. S. National Herbarium; and small collections sent me by Professor Farlow, Miss Tilden, Professor A. B. Klugh, Professor D. S. Johnson and Miss Grace Stone. They have been compared with the species distributed by Wittrock and Nordstedt in their “Algae Aquae dulcis exsiccatae,” and other valuable European and South American specimens sent me by Professors O. Borge and O. Nordstedt.

In determining almost any species of the Zygnemales it is absolutely essential that the specimens show both the vegetative cells and the mature spores. With the exception of a few species of Mougeotia the spores are colored either yellow, brown, or blue when they are mature. The characteristic markings of the median spore wall do not develop usually until this color appears. Consequently it is useless to attach names to vegetative specimens based on dimensions and number of chromatophores. Keys based on such characters are not only useless, but misleading.

Judging from my experience in Illinois it is highly probable that the list of North American forms will be considerably augmented, when intensive studies have been made at localities in the Southern United States. The most satisfactory method of collecting these forms is to take samples from the various ponds and streams at regular intervals of ten days, or two weeks, throughout the growing season. Many of the species show local variations and considerable experience is needed before many of the forms can be satisfactorily classified. The writer has in course of preparation an illustrated key to the group, in which figures for all of the species will be published. [18]

DEBARYA Wittrock.

This genus is in many respects the most generalized of all the Zygnemales. It is distinguished by three important characteristics: (1) the entire contents of the gametangia enter into the making of the zygospore; (2) the zygospore is formed in the conjugating tube and is not cut off from the other parts of the gametangia by partition walls; (3) as the gametes move toward the tube during conjugation, their place is taken by a secretion of cellulose, which renders the gametangia solid and highly refractive. This secretion also occurs when a vegetative cell forms an aplanospore.

Debarya glyptosperma Wittrock.

This species has been recorded for America. It is not uncommon in Massachusetts and has also been found in Minnesota and Florida. In P. B.-A. No. 808 from Boswell, California is a somewhat smaller variety with blue spores associated with Zygnema peliosporum Wittr. The spores are common in the material and the vegetative cells and filaments occasional. Following is a diagnosis for this variety:

Var. formosa nov. var. Cellulis vegetativis 7.5-9µ latis; zygosporis 24-30µ × 30-42µ, caeruleis; ceterum ut in typo.

Vegetative cells 7.5-9µ in diameter, zygospores 24-30µ × 30-42µ steel blue, otherwise like the type.

Debarya americana nov. sp.

Cellulis vegetativis 9-12µ × 27-120µ, ad dissepimenta constrictis; chromatophoris cum pyrenoidibus 2; cellulis fructiferis, 10-14µ × 75-180µ; zygosporis ovoideis vel quadrato-ovoideis, 20-40µ × 30-40µ, angulis rotundatis, productis, vel retusis; parthenosporis 15-20µ × 20-30µ, oblique ellipticis, cum polis retusis; mesosporio subtiliter et irregulariter verrucoso, maturitate luteo-brunneo. [19]

Vegetative cells 9-12µ × 27-120µ constricted at the end walls, chromatophore with two pyrenoids; fertile cells 10-14µ × 75-180µ; zygospores ovoid or quadrately ovoid, 20-40µ × 30-40µ, with angles rounded, produced, or retuse; parthenospores 15-20µ-× 20-30µ unilaterally ellipsoid with retuse ends; median spore wall minutely and irregularly verrucose, yellow-brown at maturity.

This species was collected by Professor A. B. Klugh, Kingston, Ontario. It is the material upon which the Ontario record for Mougeotia calcarea (Cleve) Wittr. is based. Of special interest is the chromatophore with two pyrenoids, which although an axile plate is distinctly two-lobed and forms an easy transition to the next species, in which the chromatophore resembles Zygnema. Type in herb. E. N. T. Collection No. 2950.

Debarya decussata nov. sp.

Cellulis vegetativis 16-20µ × 25-50µ cylindraceis; chromatophoris asteroidiis duobus, singulis cum pyrenoidibus (ut in Zygnemate); zygosporis vel ovoideis, vel irregularibus, 24-30µ × 30-48µ cum angulis vel rotundatis, vel retusis, vel productis; aplanosporis uno latere ovoideis, 17-25µ × 20-40µ; parthenosporis 15-20µ × 20-30µ; membrana media sporarum scrobiculata, luteo-brunnea; akinetis ad dissepimenta constrictis, membrana subcrassa et glabra, 18-20µ × 20-36µ.

Vegetative cells 16-20µ × 25-50µ cylindrical; chromatophores two, stellate, each with a pyrenoid (as in Zygnema); zygospores ovoid, quadrate-ovoid, or irregular, 24-30µ × 30-48µ, with rounded, retuse, or produced angles; aplanospores unilaterally ovoid, 17-25µ × 20-40µ; parthenospores 15-20µ × 20-30µ; median spore walls scrobiculate, yellow-brown; akinetes with smooth heavy walls, 18-20µ × 20-30µ.

Type in herb, E. N. T. Collections No. 1177, 1939, 1949, 2686 and 2918. I have specimens from several localities in central Illinois; Williamsport, Pa.; Minnesota; Mackinaw, Mich. and Kingston, Ontario.

This form is of great interest because of its resemblance, in the vegetative condition, to Zygnema decussatum (Vauch.) Transeau. Also because it shows not only the zygospores, but aplanospores and parthenospores. In all cases the secretion of cellulose accompanies the process of spore formation. The unilaterally placed aplanospores are strikingly different from those formed by the Zygnemas. In some of the Illinois ponds it regularly produces only zygospores, in other ponds from which I have collections covering a period of several years it fruited only asexually, producing aplanospores and akinetes. But several of the collections show all the forms of reproduction in different cells of the same filament. [20]

The characteristics of this species suggest that the peculiar Zygnema reticulatum, which was described by Hallas in 1895 [B], is in reality a Debarya. The fact that the reproductive cells become filled with cellulose, that the aplanospores are very irregular in form and that the vegetative cells contain as high as seven chromatophores, are all in harmony with this idea. On this basis it is also easy to understand the most notable peculiarity of the species—that spores derived from cells with several chromatophores produce two or three sporelings.

With the addition of the two new American species and this Danish species Debarya reticulata (Hallas) nov. comb. the description of the genus needs to be modified as follows:

Vegetative cells cylindrical or constricted at the ends, varying from 1-16 diameters in length; chromatophore varying from an axile plate with two or more pyrenoids to stellate chromatophores, each with a central pyrenoid. Reproduction by zygospores formed of the complete contents of the gametangia; not cut off from the gametangia by partition walls; but in the process of conjugation, as the gametes pass into the conjugating tube, their place is taken by a secretion of cellulose. Aplanospores occupying only part of the sporogenous cell, the remainder being filled with cellulose. All spores variable in form. Parthenospores and akinetes occur not infrequently in some of the species. The walls of the aplanospores and parthenospores resemble the zygospores of the same species in their markings.

There are now eleven described species belonging to this genus. D. immersa W. West and D. africana G. S. West bear a close resemblance to Mongeotia sphaerocarpa Wolle. D. Hardyi G. S. West has much the same appearance as Mongeotia viridis (Kutz) Wittrock. D. desmidiodes W. & G. S. West, D. calospora (Palla) W. & G. S. West, D. reticulata, D. americana, and D. decussata have characters in common with the Zygnemas. D. glyptosperma has the vegetative characters common to several of the species, but its spores are quite unique among the Zygnemales. [21]

ZYGNEMA Agardh.

Z. pectinatum (Vauch.) Agardh.

This is probably common in the eastern half of the United States at least. In Illinois along with the type occurs the variety conspicuum (Hass.) Kirchner, and a variety with large spores. This latter variety in fact is more common than the type.

var. crassum nov. var. Cellulis vegetativis 30-40µ × 20-80µ; zygosporis 40-55µ × 50-60µ, ceterum ut in typo.

Vegetative cells 30-40µ × 20-80µ; zygospores 40-55µ × 50-60µ, otherwise like the type. Type in herb. E. N. T. Collections No. 2350, 2392, 2660, 2685.

Z. ericetorum (Kütz) Hansgirg.

Professor G. S. West has studied the reproduction of this species and finds that it is a true Zygnema and that the description and figure by De Bary, which shows the cutting off of two special gametangia before the union of the gametes is at fault, consequently there is no longer any need of maintaining the genus Zygogonium Kützing.

Z. peliosporum Wittrock.

Specimens of this species have been distributed under the name of Z. chalybeospernum Hansgirg, in P. B.-A. No. 808 from Boswell, Calif. (N. L. Gardner); Amer. Alg. No. 156 from Ft. Collins, Colo. (J. H. Cowan); and Amer. Alg. No. 392 from Vancouver, B. C. (J. E. Tilden). Z. chalybeospermum has the median wall smooth, but the spores of all of the above specimens have distinctly scrobiculate median walls. In size the specimens show a somewhat greater variation in dimensions than has been recorded for European localities.

Z. cruciatum (Vauch) Agardh.

Specimens of this species have been found at Fath Pond, north of Coffeen, Ill., in which both zygospores and aplanospores occurred in abundance. The aplanospores fill or slightly enlarge the vegetative cells as in Z. Collinsianum Transeau,[C] but the ends of the spores are usually more nearly truncate, 34-50µ × 30-80µ. At Casey, Ill., a variety with the same dimensions but steel blue spores occurs in the old Ice Plant Pond. [22]

var. caeruleum nov. var. Cellulis vegetativis et sporis ut in typo, sed membrana media sporarum caerulea.

Vegetative cells and spores as in the type, except that the median spore wall is steel blue. Type in Collection E. N. T. No. 495.

Zygnema stellinum (Müller) Agardh.

The specimen distributed under the name Z. insigne (Hass.) Kütz. in the P. B.-A. No. 457, from Chestnut Hill, Mass. (G. F. Moore), belongs to this species as shown by the scattered mature spores. This species is common everywhere in central Illinois. In the U. S. Natl. Herb, is a specimen from Baltimore Co., Md., (J. D. Smith). In Amer. Alg. No. 157, a specimen from St. Paul, Minn., (J. E. Tilden) shows both zygospores and aplanospores. The aplanospores are cylindric ovoid in form, occupying the entire cell 30-33µ × 40-88µ, median wall scrobiculate.

Zygnema cylindricum nov. sp.

Cellulis vegetativis 28-33µ × 28-66µ; zygosporis incognitis; aplanosporis cylindricis vel tumido-cylindricis, 30-33µ × 24-58µ, sporangia complentibus; membrana media brunnea scrobiculata.

Vegetative cells 28-33µ × 28-66µ; zygospores unknown; aplanospores cylindric or tumid-cylindric, 30-33µ × 24-58µ, filling the sporangia, median wall brown, scrobiculate. Type in Herb. E. N. T. No. 1164, 1177.

This species is not uncommon in ponds, and pools throughout central Illinois. It was at first classified as aplanosporic material of Z. stellinum (Müller) Agardh. On going over the specimens in all my collections, however, it was found that in no case were the filaments containing the aplanospores connected with the filaments containing zygospores. This must be the final test of the identity of the species, as it occurs in some collections alone, sometimes associated only with fruiting Zygnema pectinatum, and sometimes with Z. stellinum.

Zygnema rhynchonema Hansg.

In a collection of algae made at the Minnesota Seaside Station, Vancouver Island, B. C., in 1901, by Professor Tilden, is a form which perhaps belongs here. The vegetative cells are from 22-28µ in diameter, and 32-52µ in length, while the European specimens are described as [23] 16-20µ in diameter and 2-6 diameters long. The Vancouver specimens are producing both aplanospores (globose, 24-26µ in diam.), and zygospores (ovoid 24-28µ × 36-44µ) by the union of gametes through the partition wall separating the two gametangia. The specimens show some evidences of being in an abnormal condition.

SPIROGYRA Link.

S. Juergensii Kützing.

The specimen in P. B.-A. No. 510 from Knightsville, R. I., distributed under the name of S. longata (Vauch) Kütz. with cell diameter 27-30µ, and ellipsoid spores 30-33µ in diameter, fertile cells enlarged, evidently belongs to this species. The spores of S. longata are distinctly ovoid with rounded ends. In the Illinois specimens the spores of S. Juergensii frequently occur with diameters up to 33µ.

S. varians (Hass.) Kütz.

The varieties scrobiculata Stockman and minor Teodoresco have not been reported from America. They both occur rarely in Illinois. The latter I have also seen in material collected by Mr. Charles Bullard, at Lynnfield, Mass. The former is characterized by its scrobiculate spores, the latter by its smaller dimensions throughout. In my herbarium S. varians scrobiculata is represented in Collections No. 1799, and 1881; and S. varians minor in Collection No. 2951.

S. Borgeana nov. sp.

Cellulis vegetativis 30-35µ × 50-200µ, dissepimentis planis, chromatophoris singulis anfractibus arctis 1.5-5; cellulis fractiferis altero latere inflatis, altero latere (in quo conjugatio sequitur) rectis; zygosporis ellipticis, 33-40µ × 54-70µ, membrana media flava, glabra.

Vegetative cells 30-35µ × 50-200µ, end walls plane, 1 chromatophore making 1.5-5 turns; fertile cells inflated on the outer side, straight on the conjugating side; zygospores ellipsoid 33-40µ × 54-70µ, median wall yellow, smooth. Type in herb. E. N. T. Coll. No. 1883, 1890. Charleston, Illinois. [24]

This species bears some resemblance to a form of S. varians figured by Professor Borge.[D] It differs from his figure in that the conjugating side of the fertile cells is not at all swollen, and the dimensions are somewhat larger. If this form had been found but once it would have been passed over as a variation intermediate between S. Juergensii and S. varians. But it has been found several successive years in a small stream south, and at a small pond west of Charleston, Illinois.

S. lutetiana Petit.

So far as I am aware no specimens of this species have been found in America. The Illinois record in my list [E] is an error. The P. B.-A. specimen labelled S. lutetiana is S. fallax (Hansg.) Wille, as shown by its often replicate cell walls, verrucose spores and the number of chromotophores.

S. velata Nordstedt var. occidentalis Transeau.

Specimens of this variety have been distributed in the P. B.-A. No. 96, under the name of S. dubia Kütz. var. longiarticulata Kütz. from Oak Bay, Victoria, British Columbia (N. L. Gardner). The spores are for the most part not mature but they show the characteristic scrobiculate markings of the median wall.

S. Lagerheimii Wittrock.

This species is not uncommon in central Illinois. The specimen labelled S. communis in P. B.-A. No. 1416, from Winchester, Mass., has a cell diameter over 30µ, and the spores are ellipsoid instead of ovoid. The median spore wall in the mature spores is punctate. Here also belongs the P. B.-A. specimen No. 365, Falmouth, Mass. Both the vegetative cells and the spores are considerably below the lower dimensions for S. porticalis. The P. B.-A. specimen No. 1668, S. porticalis var. tenuispira Collins establishes this name as a synonym of S. Lagerheimii. Professor Farlow has recently sent me a specimen of this species from Chocorua, N. H.

S. daedalea Lagerheim.

This species has recently been found in a pond south of Coffeen, Ill. The spores show the characteristic markings and the dimensions are near those of the original collection. The spores are slightly more rhomboidal than in the type material, which I have seen. In herb. E. N. T. Collection No. 2912, 2850. [25]

S. Goetzei Schmidle.

This species previously known only from the tropics has been found in the collection of Mr. Charles Bullard, from Wellfleet, Mass. In herb. E. N. T. Collection No. 2954.

S. submarina (Collins) nov. comb.

This species was described by Collins as a variety of S. decimina (Müller) Kütz, which it somewhat resembles in the form of the vegetative cells. The spores, however, are distinctly ellipsoid, while those of S. decimina are ovoid. The dimensions are much smaller than those of S. decimina. It seems better therefore to recognize this as a distinct species. It has been collected in Massachusetts, Connecticut and Bermuda.

E. ellipsospora Transeau.

Described originally from Illinois, I have seen specimens during the past year from Maine, Massachusetts and Minnesota. Professor G. S. West [F] described about the same time a species from Columbia, South America, which appears to be a form of this same species. The vegetative cells are considerably larger, the chromatophores are six (or five) in number, and the spores are at the upper limit of size of the North American form. As our specimens all show, a wider range of dimensions and number of chromatophores, the South American form is best classified as a variety under the name S. ellipsospora var. splendida (G. S. West) nov. comb.

S. propria nov. sp.

Cellulis vegetativis 60-68µ × 80-150µ, dissepimentis planis; chromatophoris 3, anfractibus arctis .5-1; cellulis fructiferis cylindricis; zygosporis ellipticis 42-60µ × 80-120µ; membrana media sporarum scrobiculis irregularis ornata, luteo-brunnea.

Vegetative cells 60-68µ × 80-150µ, end walls plane; 3 chromatophores making .5-1 turn in the cell; fertile cells cylindrical; zygospores ellipsoid, 42-60µ × 80-120µ, median wall irregularly pitted, yellow-brown. Type in herb. E. N. T. Coll. No. 2666. Coffeen, Illinois. [26]

This species is very distinct in the form of its spores and their position in the fertile cells. Lateral conjugation only has been observed. It is possible that the number of chromatophores is more variable, but in all the vegetative cells in which they could be counted there were three.

Spirogyra braziliensis (Nordstedt) nov. comb.

Owing to the indefinite and imperfect description of S. lineata Suring., the variety Braziliensis Nordstedt, of which we have a perfect description and specimens (W. & N. Alg. aq. dulc. exsicc. No. 360), should be given specific rank. Its connection with S. lineata is very problematical.

S. fluviatilis Hilse.

In all the published descriptions of this species the spores are described as smooth, and the number of chromatophores is given as four. I have seen many specimens from Illinois, and collections from the upper peninsula of Michigan (T. L. Hankinson), Minnesota (J. E. Tilden), Hawaii (J. E. Tilden), Massachusetts (P. B.-A. No. 1217), Pennsylvania (E. N. T.) and Guatemala (W. A. Kellerman). In all cases the mature spores are brown and scrobiculate, and the number of chromatophores is three or four.

S. nova-angliae nov. sp.

Cellulis vegetativis 50-60µ × 200-350µ, dissepimentis planis; chromatophoris 3-5, anfractibus arctis 2.5-4.5; cellulis fructiferis non inflatis; zygosporis ovoideis 50-65µ × 80-120µ: membrana media sporarum reticulata et dense punctata, flava.

Vegetative cells 50-60µ × 200-350µ, end walls plane; 3-5 chromatophores making 2.5-4.5 turns; fertile cells not inflated; zygospores ovoid 50-65µ × 80-120µ: median wall reticulate and densely punctate, yellow in color.

This species was first found in the collections of Mr. Bullard from Beaver Dam, Brook Pond, Natick; the pond west of Winter Pond, Winchester; and the Middlesex Fells, Mass. Recently the same form was found in a large prairie pond south of Coffeen, Illinois. Its position in the genus is near S. malmeana Hirn. In herb. E. N. T. Collections No. 2952, 2953 and 2900. [27]

S. diluta Wood.

I first came across this species in Mr. Bullard’s collection from the pond west of Winter Pond, Winchester, Mass. On going over Wood’s description, its identity with S. diluta is unmistakable. The position, color and form of the spore, and the shape of the fertile cells is perfectly represented in Wood’s figure. The dimensions also correspond. Wolle is responsible for confusing this species with S. nitida (Dillw.) Link, but a glance at Wood’s figure is sufficient to show that it is very different from that species. The P. B. A. specimen No. 513 (labelled S. nitida) from Bridgeport, Conn., belongs here. Miss Grace Stone also sent me a collection of this species from near New York City. In the U. S. National Herbarium is another specimen from Bois Sabbi, Louisiana, April 7th, 1891, (A. B. Langlois). Recently the species has been collected at Donnelson, Illinois, by Mr. Frank Harris.

The vegetative cells are usually shorter than in S. nitida, the spores are ovoid, not ellipsoid, and the spore wall is verrucose, or reticulate-verrucose, chestnut brown in color. In herb. E. N. T. Coll. No. 2900.

S. crassa Kützing.

Var. formosa nov. var. Varietas gracilis, cellulis vegetativis 80-95µ × 80-270µ; zygosporis 88-100µ × 120-150µ × 70-90µ; ceterum ut in typo.

A small variety, vegetative cells 80-95µ × 80-270µ: zygospores 88-100µ × 120-150µ × 70-90µ; otherwise similar to the type. Type in herb. E. N. T. Coll. No. 1939. This variety occurs in a pond east of Ashmore, Ill.

S. submaxima Transeau.

This species which was described from Illinois has been found with nearly the same dimensions in the collections from Middlesex Fells, and South Peabody Station, Mass., sent me by Mr. Chas. Bullard.

S. micropunctata nov. sp.

Cellulis vegetativis 30-36µ × 120-300µ, dissepimentis planis, chromatophoris singulis anfractibus arctis 3-7; cellulis fructiferis modo binis vel quaternis inter cellulas vegetativas distributis, modo continuis, altero latere (in quo conjugatio sequitur) inflatis, altero rectis; tubo conjugationis plerumque ex cellula mascula emisso; zygosporis ellipticis 37-42µ × 57-100µ membrana media micropunctata et lutea. [28]

Vegetative cells 30-36µ × 120-300µ, end walls plane; 1 chromatophore making 3-7 turns; fertile cells scattered in twos or fours among vegetative cells, or continuous, inflated on the conjugating side, outer side straight; conjugating tubes formed almost wholly by the male cell, zygospores ellipsoid 37-42µ × 57-70µ, median wall minutely punctate, yellow. Type in herb. E. N. T. Coll. No. 2470, 2953.

This species was first found in the West Big Four Pond, east of Charleston, Illinois. It has since been found in a collection from Chocorua, N. H., sent me by Mr. Chas. Bullard. It evidently belongs in the punctata group of the Spirogyras, but in form and markings of the spore, and the shape of the fertile cells it is amply distinct from its nearest allies; S. punctiformis Transeau and the next species to be described.

S. reflexa nov. sp.

Cellulis vegetativis 30-40µ × 120-300µ, dissepimentis planis; chromatophoris singulis anfractibus arctis 3-8 cellulis fructiferis binis vel quaternis inter cellulas vegetativas distributis, inflatis et valde reflexis; tubo conjugationis ex cellula mascula emisso; zygosporis ellipticis, 44-54µ × 90-150µ, membrana media glabra et luteo-brunnea.

Vegetative cells 30-40µ × 120-300µ, with plane end wall; 1 chromatophore making 3-8 turns; fertile cells in groups of 2 or 4, inflated or enlarged and strongly reflexed; conjugating tube formed by the male cells; zygospores ellipsoid, 44-54µ × 90-150µ, median wall smooth, yellow-brown. Type in herb. E. N. T. Collection No. 2661, 2664, 2912.

This species has been under observation for four years and has been collected from ponds near Casey, Lerna, Coffeen and Donnellson, Illinois. The large, smooth spores, the reflexed conjugating cells, and the tube produced wholly by the male cells are the distinguishing characteristics.

S. hydrodictya nov. sp.

Cellulis vegetativis 75-100µ × 210-360µ, dissepimentis planis, chromatophoris 7-10, modo subrectis longitudinalibus, modo spiralibus anfractibus arctis .1-.5; cellulis fructiferis inflatis vel subinflatis; tubo conjugationis ex cellula mascula emisso; zygosporis lenticularibus vel globoso-lenticularibus, 80-120µ × 110-195µ, membrana media scrobiculis obsita, brunnea. [29]

Vegetative cells 75-100µ × 210-360µ, end walls plane, 7-10 chromatophores, either straight, or spiral making .1-.5 turns; fertile cells inflated or subinflated; conjugating tube formed by the male cell; zygospores lenticular or globose-lenticular 80-120µ × 110-195µ, median wall brown, pitted. Type in herb. E. N. T. Coll. No. 2661, 2665. Coffeen, Illinois.

This is one of the most remarkable forms described in this genus. It combines large size, the lenticular spore form, and the habit of forming the conjugating tube entirely by the male cell. The conjugating tube has walls heavier than those of any known species. Conjugation is both lateral and scalariform, and occurs between scattered cells, very rarely continuous for 6-8 cells. In the fruiting condition the filaments form a mesh-work which suggests the specific name. It has thus far been found only in the Fath Pond, north of Coffeen, Illinois.

S. protecta Wood.

A study of American specimens of this species from Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Michigan and Illinois, shows that like S. Grevilleana there are always some cells with two chromatophores. I have twice found this species producing aplanospores.

S. tenuissima (Hass.) Kütz var. rugosa Transeau.

P. B.-A. specimen No. 456, Easton’s Pt., Newport, R. I., belongs to this variety rather than the type, as shown by the scrobiculate spore wall. In Mr. Bullard’s collection there are also specimens of the variety from Pennannock, N. J., and from Spy Pond, Lake St., Arlington, Mass.

S. Farlowii nov. sp.

Cellulis vegetativis 24-30µ × 70-180µ, dissepimentis replicatis; chromatophoris singulis, rarius duobus, anfractibus arctis 2.5-6; cellulis fructiferis inflatis (ad 39-60µ); zygosporis ellipticis, polis plus minus acuminatis, 32-45µ × 48-93µ, membrana media glabra, lutea. [30]

Vegetative cells 24-30µ × 70-180µ, end walls replicate; 1 (rarely 2) chromatophore making 2.5-6 turns; fertile cells inflated to 39-60µ; zygospores ellipsoid, ends more or less pointed, 32-45µ × 48-93µ, median wall smooth, yellow. Type in herb. E. N. T. Coll. No. 2955, 2956, 2957.

In Mr. Bullard’s collection there are specimens of this species from Lexington, Arlington, and Middlesex Fells, Mass. The P. B.-A. specimen No. 362, labeled S. Grevilleana, from Medford, Mass., belongs here, rather than to S. Grevilleana, in which the spores are distinctly ovoid with broad rounded ends.

S. groenlandica Rosenvinge.

This interesting form is characterized by quadrately inflated fertile cells, highly refractive cell walls, and unusually long cells and spores. In Mr. Bullard’s collection there are specimens from Stony Brook, South Framingham, Middlesex Fells, Wayside Inn, North Eastham, and Malden Fells, Massachusetts. The P. B.-A. specimen No. 363 labelled S. inflata, Orange, Conn., belongs to this species.

S. fallax (Hansgirg) Wille.

This species is one of several forms near S. insignis (Hass.) Kützing. If Wille’s description is correct and identical with Hansgirg’s material, then S. inconstans Collins becomes a synonym of S. fallax. Hansgirg’s figure suggests that the filaments in his material are homosexual. While Wille’s description and figure suggests that the filaments are reflexed and that conjugation does not regularly occur between parallel filaments, with the spores all in one filament. It is difficult to decide just where these rough-spored forms belong as the earlier authors did not pay much attention to spore markings. In this connection the note by Professor Nordstedt in connection with specimen No. 958 in Wittrock and Nordstedt’s Algae Exsiccatae is of interest. Until these forms have been clearly separated by a study of the original collections it seems best to use S. fallax for S. inconstans, of which the type is P. B.-A. No. 1568. Here also belongs P. B.-A. No. 1570, Middlesex Fells, Mass., and P. B.-A. No. 1571, Wakefield, Mass.

S. floridana nov. sp.

Cellulis vegetativis 56-66µ × 120-335µ, dissepimentis planis; chromatophoris 4-5, subrectis vel anfractibus arctis .5; cellulis conjugatis abbreviatis, inflatis (ad 135µ) et geniculatis; canalis conjugationis brevis et latis; zygosporis ellipticis, 75-105µ × 95-135µ membrana media glabra, lutea. [31]

Vegetative cells 56-66µ × 120-335µ, end walls plane; 4-5 chromatophores, nearly straight or making a half turn; conjugating cells geniculate, shortened; fertile cells inflated up to 135µ; conjugating tube very short and broad; zygospores ellipsoid, 75-105µ × 95-135µ median wall smooth, yellow. Type in U. S. National Herbarium, collected by J. D. Smith, in S. W. Florida, March, 1878.

In its dimensions S. floridana is intermediate between S. stictica (Eng. Bot.) Wille and S. ceylanica Wittrock. In several publications the statement is made that S. ceylanica is intermediate between S. stictica and the common forms of Spirogyra. A study of authentic material of this species has shown that it has not intermediate characters, but with its spores having a minutely pitted median wall, it seems to be intermediate between S. floridana and S. illinoiensis Transeau, the most specialized form in the Sirogonium group of the genus.

Throughout the study of these collections the writer has been greatly assisted by Mr. Hanford Tiffany, now a teacher in the Charleston, Illinois, High School. It is a pleasure to acknowledge my indebtedness to the many collectors who have sent me specimens for study.

As the result of the sentiment expressed at the 1914 meeting of the Ohio Academy of Science that the official organ of the Academy, “The Ohio Naturalist,” should be broadened and made more comprehensive in scope, and feeling that the Ohio State University had no publication representing the scientific work being done at the institution, the members of the Biological Club of the University, in whom the publication of the “Ohio Naturalist” had been vested, called a meeting of representatives of the various departments interested in science at the university to discuss the advisability of publishing as successor to the “Naturalist” a journal to be known as the Ohio Journal of Science.

The first meeting was held in May, 1915, and committees appointed to outline preliminary plans. At subsequent meetings the reports of the committees were discussed, interest in the plan continued to develop, until at a meeting held October 13 the following self-explanatory Constitution was adopted. The society as now constituted represents twenty-four departments of pure or applied science at the university.

CONSTITUTION.

Article I—Name.

Article II—Object.

It shall be the purpose of the Society to promote scientific work in the University by holding meetings for the presentation and discussion of the results of scientific work; by co-operating with other agencies in arranging for scientific lectures and in the entertainment of visiting scientists and scientific societies; by publishing the Ohio Journal of Science and by furnishing opportunity for the discussion and promotion of any project of scientific interest which may properly come within the scope of such an organization and, in general, by furthering in every way possible the interests of scientific work in the University and the State.

Article III—Membership.

Any member of the instructional staff in the Ohio State University interested in scientific work shall upon application be eligible to election to membership in the Society. Students of the Ohio State University interested in scientific work shall be eligible to membership when endorsed by two faculty members of the society.

Article IV—Officers.

Section 1. The officers of the society shall consist of President, Vice-President, Secretary and Treasurer. These officers shall perform the duties common to such positions.

Section 2. The Executive Committee shall consist of the officers and the Editor of the Ohio Journal of Science. It shall have power to arrange programs for meetings, to represent the society when co-operating with other organizations and to conduct all affairs of the society not otherwise provided for. [34]

Article V—Editorial Board.

The Editorial Board shall be responsible for the management of the Ohio Journal of Science. It shall consist of representatives, one from each department of science in the university represented in the society membership. This board shall elect annually an Editor and two Associate Editors.

Article VI—Elections.

The officers shall be elected by ballot at the annual meeting in May. Nominations shall be presented by a nominating committee which shall consist of the Editorial Board.

One member of the Editorial Board shall be elected by each department from among the members of such department represented in the society and in case any department fails to elect a member for this board the Executive Committee shall elect for the department.

Article VII—Publication.

The Editor and Associate Editors of the Ohio Journal of Science shall have immediate direction of the publication. The department editors shall be responsible for the approval of papers from their several departments, and all papers offered for publication shall be submitted to such department editors.

The selection for publication from available material shall be determined by the Editorial Board.

Article VIII—Quorum.

A quorum for the transaction of regular business shall consist of at least fifteen members with a representation of at least one-third of the departments included in the society.

Article IX—Amendments.

Amendments to the constitution may be made by the concurrence of three-fourths of the members present at a duly called meeting, notice of such amendment having been given to all members at least one week in advance.

BY-LAWS.

Article I.

The membership fees of the society shall be twenty-five cents per year or one dollar for a period of five years and such fee shall entitle the members to participation in all activities of the society but shall not include the subscription to the Ohio Journal of Science.

Article II.

The subscription price to the Ohio Journal of Science shall be two dollars to non-members, and one dollar and seventy-five cents to members.

Article III.

The fiscal year of the society shall coincide with that of the University—July 1st to June 30th. The publication to be issued during eight months, beginning with November.

Article IV.

Regular meetings shall be held on the second Tuesday evening of the months of October, November, March, April and May. The meeting in May shall be the annual meeting for the election of officers and an editorial board. Other meetings may be called by the Executive Committee, or by the President on petition of five members.

Article V.

The University Instructional Staff shall be understood to include any member of the teaching force.

Article VI.

Amendments to the By-laws may be adopted at any regular meeting by vote of a majority of the members present, notice of proposed amendment having been given at time meeting is called.

Scientific Illustrations given extremely
careful attention by highly skilled
artisans using the most modern equipment

The Ohio State University

COLUMBUS

WILLIAM OXLEY THOMPSON, President.

Ten Colleges and a Graduate School
	College of Agriculture
	College of Arts, Philosophy and Science
	College of Education
	College of Engineering
	College of Homeopathic Medicine
	College of Law
	College of Medicine
	College of Dentistry
	College of Pharmacy
	College of Veterinary Medicine
	Graduate School
	Summer Session (Eight weeks)

For general information, catalogue, or special bulletin describing each college, with fees and announcement of courses.

Address:
L. E. WOLFE, Secretary Entrance Board,

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

FOOTNOTES:

[A] Contribution from the Botanical Laboratory of the Ohio State University, No. 91.

[B] Hallas, E., Om en ny Zygnema-Art med Azygosporer. Bot. Tidsskrift 20:1-16. 1895.

[C] See Fig. 3, Plate XXV, Amer. Jour. Bot. 1:301. 1914.

[D] Borge, O., Beitrage zur Algenflora von Schweden.

[E] Transeau, E. N., Annotated list of the Algae of Eastern Illinois. Trans. Ill. Acad. Sci. 6:69-89, 1913.

[F] West, G. S., A contribution to our knowledge of the Freshwater Algae of Columbia. Memoires de la Societe neuchateloise des Sciences Naturelles 5:1013-1051. Neuchatel, 1914.

Transcriber's Notes:

The cover image was created by the transcriber, and is in the public domain.

Uncertain or antiquated spellings or ancient words were not corrected.

The illustrations have been moved so that they do not break up paragraphs and so that they are next to the text they illustrate.

Errors in punctuation and inconsistent hyphenation were not corrected unless otherwise noted.

Typographical errors have been silently corrected but other variations in spelling and punctuation remain unaltered.

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, VOL. XVI, NO. 1, NOVEMBER 1915 ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”
• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.
• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the work.
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™

Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™, including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.

Ohio Academy of Science Publications.
First and Second Annual Reports	Price 30 cts. each
Third and Fourth Annual Reports	Price 25 cts. each
Fifth to Sixteenth Annual Reports	Price 20 cts. each
Seventeenth Annual Report	Price 40 cts. each

SPECIAL PAPERS.
1.	Sandusky Flora. pp. 107. E. L. Moseley	60 cts.
2.	The Odonata of Ohio. pp. 116. David S. Kellicott	60 cts.
3.	The Preglacial Drainage of Ohio. pp. 75. W. G. Tight,
	J. A. Bownocker, J. H. Todd and Gerard Fowke	50 cts.
4.	The Fishes of Ohio. pp. 105. Raymond C. Osburn	60 cts.
5.	Tabanidæ of Ohio. pp. 63. James S. Hine	50 cts.
6.	The Birds of Ohio. pp. 241. Lynds Jones	75 cts.
7.	Ecological Study of Big Spring Prairie. pp. 96. Thomas A. Bonser	50 cts.
8.	The Coccidæ of Ohio, i. pp. 66. James G. Sanders	50 cts.
9.	Batrachians and Reptiles of Ohio. pp. 54. Max Morse	50 cts.
10.	Ecological Study of Brush Lake. pp. 20. J. H. Schaffner,
	Otto E. Jennings, Fred J. Tyler	35 cts.
11.	The Willows of Ohio. pp. 60. Robert F. Griggs	50 cts.
12.	Land and Fresh-water Mollusca of Ohio. pp. 35. V. Sterkj	50 cts.
13.	The Protozoa of Sandusky Bay and Vicinity. F. L. Landacre	60 cts.
14.	Discomycetes in the Vicinity of Oxford, Ohio. pp. 54.
	Freda M. Bachman	50 cts.
15.	Trees of Ohio and Surrounding Territory. pp. 122. John H. Schaffner	75 cts.
16.	The Pteridophytes of Ohio. pp. 41. John H. Schaffner	50 cts.
17.	Fauna of the Maxville Limestone. pp. 65. W. C. Morse	60 cts.
18.	The Agaricaceæ of Ohio. pp. 116. W. G. Stover	75 cts.
19.	An Ecological Study of Buckeye Lake. pp. 138. Frederica Detmers	75 cts.
Address: C. W. REEBE, Librarian, Ohio Academy of Science.
Library, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introductory	1
Lord—The Making of a Photographic Objective	3
Transeau—Notes on the Zygnemales	17
Organization of the Ohio State University Scientific Society	32

Editor,	John H. Schaffner
Associate Editor,	James S. Hine
Associate Editor,	Frederick W. Ives
EDITORIAL BOARD
J. F. Lyman	Agricultural Chemistry
F. W. Ives	Agricultural Engineering
A. G. McCall	Agronomy
F. L. Landacre	Anatomy
J. H. Schaffner	Botany
Carl B. Harrop	Ceramic Engineering
Jas. R. Withrow	Chemistry
F. H. Eno	Civil Engineering
N. W. Scherer	Forestry
C. S. Prosser	Geology
V. H. Davis	Horticulture
W. A. Knight	Industrial Arts
C. J. West	Mathematics
Horace Judd	Mechanical Engineering
Jonathan Forman	Pathology
F. C. Blake	Physics
R. J. Seymour	Physiology (General)
Clayton McPeek	Physiology (Medical)
E. R. Hayhurst	Public Health & Sanitation
J. S. Hine	Zoology and Entomology

The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Ohio Journal of Science, Vol. XVI, No. 1, November 1915

The OhioJournal of ScienceNOVEMBER, Volume XVI. 1915 Number 1.

INTRODUCTORY.

THE MAKING OF A PHOTOGRAPHIC OBJECTIVE.

NOTES ON THE ZYGNEMALES.[A]

DEBARYA Wittrock.

Debarya glyptosperma Wittrock.

Debarya americana nov. sp.

Debarya decussata nov. sp.

ZYGNEMA Agardh.

Z. pectinatum (Vauch.) Agardh.

Z. ericetorum (Kütz) Hansgirg.

Z. peliosporum Wittrock.

Z. cruciatum (Vauch) Agardh.

Zygnema stellinum (Müller) Agardh.

Zygnema cylindricum nov. sp.

Zygnema rhynchonema Hansg.

SPIROGYRA Link.

S. Juergensii Kützing.

S. varians (Hass.) Kütz.

S. Borgeana nov. sp.

S. lutetiana Petit.

S. velata Nordstedt var. occidentalis Transeau.

S. Lagerheimii Wittrock.

S. daedalea Lagerheim.

S. Goetzei Schmidle.

S. submarina (Collins) nov. comb.

E. ellipsospora Transeau.

S. propria nov. sp.

Spirogyra braziliensis (Nordstedt) nov. comb.

S. fluviatilis Hilse.

S. nova-angliae nov. sp.

S. diluta Wood.

S. crassa Kützing.

S. submaxima Transeau.

S. micropunctata nov. sp.

S. reflexa nov. sp.

S. hydrodictya nov. sp.

S. protecta Wood.

S. tenuissima (Hass.) Kütz var. rugosa Transeau.

S. Farlowii nov. sp.

S. groenlandica Rosenvinge.

S. fallax (Hansgirg) Wille.

S. floridana nov. sp.

ORGANIZATION OF THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITYSCIENTIFIC SOCIETY.

CONSTITUTION.