The Project Gutenberg eBook of A New Species Of Heteromyid Rodent From The Middle Oligocene Of, by Edwin C. Galbreath.

University of Kansas Publications
Museum of Natural History

Volume 1, No. 18, pp. 285-300, 2 plates
August 16, 1948

University of Kansas
LAWRENCE
1948

University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History

Editors: E. Raymond Hall, Chairman; H. H. Lane, Edward H. Taylor

Volume 1, No. 18, pp. 285-300, 2 plates
August 16, 1948

University of Kansas
Lawrence, Kansas

PRINTED BY
FERD VOILAND, JR., STATE PRINTER
TOPEKA, KANSAS
1948

22-3342

New Species of Heteromyid Rodent from the Middle Oligocene of Northeast Colorado with Remarks on the Skull

EDWIN C. GALBREATH

Heretofore our knowledge of the osteology of Heliscomys Cope has been extremely limited; this genus previously was known by its teeth, fragmental maxillaries, incomplete palatine bone and mandible, and part of one forelimb. In the summer of 1946 the writer, as a member of the University of Kansas Museum of Natural History field party, discovered the anterior part of a skull of Heliscomys in the middle Oligocene deposits of Logan County, Colorado. This specimen, representing a new species, yields a welcome, and greatly desired addition to our fund of information about the genus.

The writer is indebted to Dr. Robert W. Wilson for advice and helpful criticism in the course of this study, and to Mr. Bryan Patterson of the Chicago Natural History Museum for the loan of comparative material. Mrs. Bernita Mansfield of the Geology Department, University of Kansas, prepared the plates.

Family HETEROMYIDAE

Heliscomys tenuiceps, new species

Holotype.—Anterior part of a skull with left P4-M3, No. 7702, Vertebrate Paleontological Collection, Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas.

Geological Age and locality.—Silts of Orellan age in the Cedar Creek facies of the Brule formation in "Chimney Canyon," Sec. 3, T. 11 N, R. 54 W, Logan County, Colorado.

Diagnosis.—Size larger than any known species; P4 with posteroexternal cusp (metacone) anterior to central (hypocone) and lingual (entostyle) cusps, which are connected by a cingulum; internal cingula of molars undivided, and as high as paracone and metacone; style of each cingulum opposite the straight median valley; rostrum deep and laterally compressed.

Description.—The type consists of the preorbital and interorbital parts of a skull. Its size is comparable to that of the Recent heteromyid, Liomys pictus Merriam. L. pictus is the species referred to in the comparisons below when only the generic name Liomys is mentioned. Both incisors have been broken off. The right tooth-row is missing, but the left row is complete, and its orientation indicates that the tooth rows were parallel. The zygomata are broken off close to the rostrum, which is relatively narrow in comparison with its length and depth. In this narrowness, the specimen resembles Florentiamys Wood more than it does such Recent heteromyids as Liomys or Heteromys, where the rostrum is much wider at the dorsal surface than at the ventral[Pg 290] surface (correlating with the wide interorbital dimension). In No. 7702 the rostrum is not appreciably expanded on the dorsal surface. The wide interorbital dimension also gives a tapering appearance to the rostrum of the Recent heteromyids, when viewed dorsally, which is not seen in the fossil specimen. Like those of most heteromyids, the nasals and premaxillaries project forward beyond the incisors.

H. tenuiceps has a distinctly heteromyidlike appearance, and it is obvious that the features of the anterior part of the skull, which characterize the heteromyids, had been established by middle Oligocene time.

The nasal bone extends caudad as far as does the premaxillary; they terminate at the anterior border of the orbit. The nasal is widest anteriorly where it curves downward on the side to meet the anterior projection of the premaxillary bone beyond the incisor. Posteriorly, the two nasals have practically parallel lateral borders much as in Liomys.

The frontal bone dorsally is relatively narrower than in any Recent heteromyid, and closely resembles that of the geomyids. There is a slight depression in the midline of the skull where the two frontals unite, but no evidence of a ridge for the attachment of the temporal muscle. In lateral view, the ledge seen in Liomys at the dorsal surface is absent, nor is this surface rounded as in Geomys. Preservation around the nasolacrimal canal is poor, but traces of sutures indicate that the frontal bone is not involved in the posteromedial wall of that canal. The orbital plate is broad, comparatively flat, and extends farther ventrad than in Liomys, and enters into the composition of the sphenopalatine foramina. Ventrally the frontal bone meets the orbital processes of the palatine and maxillary bones, and posterolaterally meets the orbitosphenoid.

In the anterodorsal angle of the rim of the orbit the lacrimal bone rests against the frontal and maxillary bones, where the body of the lacrimal contributes to the formation of the posteromedial wall of the nasolacrimal canal. Only a slight part of the maxillary process of the lacrimal remains on each side.

The premaxillary bone, which constitutes most of the anterior part of the rostrum, is typically heteromyid in shape. The frontal process is long and slender. On the side of the rostrum the premaxillary forms the anterointernal border of the infraorbital foramen. The ventrolateral border of the bone is expanded slightly and aids in the formation of the tuberosity made by the maxillary bone at the ventroposterior border of the foramen. Ventrally the premaxillary makes up the anterior two-thirds of the lateral wall of the incisive (anterior palatine) foramen. It is not possible to establish what part of the median septum between the foramina is made up of premaxillary bones. The incisor arches through the premaxillary in a manner similar to that in Liomys, with the upper wall of the root canal being formed by the upper surface of the bone. Due to the narrowness of the rostrum, the root of the incisor is prominently outlined on the side of the rostrum, both in the premaxillary and maxillary bones. With this modeling of the side of the rostrum because of the incisor root canal, and the flaring of the posterior and ventral edges of the infraorbital foramen, the side wall of the premaxillary appears as a depressed area. Anterior to the incisor root the tip of the premaxillary projects forward, and parallels its opposite, laterally, instead of turning inward[Pg 291] as in Liomys. This condition, together with the prominence of the root canal, makes the anterior tip project as a flange. The premaxillary extends downward as a plate of bone, and embraces the posterior and lateral sides of the incisor as in Recent heteromyids. The interpremaxillary foramen, if present, is obscure. However, there appears to be a foramen posterior to the incisor, which possibly has taken over the function of the interpremaxillary foramen.

Both maxillary bones are incomplete, and lack the zygomatic processes. The rostral part of the maxillary is compressed laterally, as is the premaxillary. The anterior border of the maxillary contributes to the formation of the border of the anterior opening of the infraorbital canal where, at the posteroventral border of the opening, the bone is produced into a prominent tuberosity which projects laterally approximately one millimeter on each side. The infraorbital foramen (anterior opening of the infraorbital canal) lies about midway between the anterior end of the skull and the root of the zygoma. High on each side of the rostrum, and beneath the dorsal edge of the masseteric plate, is an area containing small foramina. The zygomasseteric plate is inclined forward at the dorsal end, and extends anteriorly almost to the highest part of the arch of the canal for the root of the incisor. The posterior end of the infraorbital canal lies on the median side of the zygomatic root as it does in H. hatcheri Wood. Ventrally the zygomatic root rises above the fourth premolar as in H. gregoryi Wood, H. hatcheri, and in Recent heteromyids. The ventral part of the orbit, containing the sphenopalatine foramen, presphenoid foramen, and the sphenoidal fissure, is not constricted as in Liomys, but is open like that of the squirrels. This condition is emphasized by the narrowness of the interorbital part of the skull and the more vertical position of the orbital plate.

The alisphenoid bone is large and forms part of the posteromedial wall of the orbit. The sphenofrontal foramen lies in the suture between the extreme anterior margin of this bone and the frontal bone.

The orbitosphenoid bone makes up little of the orbital wall. It occupies the posterior area of the orbit between the alisphenoid and palatine, and is in contact with these bones and the frontal. The presphenoid canal between the orbits is large, and the entrance at each end is well separated from the sphenoidal fissure. Damage to the sphenoidal fissure, which occurred prior to preservation, obscures its relationship to the optic foramen. No bar was found that would indicate that the two openings were widely separate. Anteroventrally the sphenoidal fissure is bounded by the orbitosphenoid bone, and dorsolaterally by the alisphenoid bone. Between the presphenoid foramen and the orbitosphenoid-frontal suture there is a distinct ridge, and the suture between the two bones lies in an elongate pit or trough formed by the anterior sloping side of the ridge and the impressed lateral wall of the frontal bone.

The palatine bone is represented by fragments joined to other bones of the skull. The maxillary process of the left palatine bone is united to the maxillary by a highly sinuous suture. The union of the palatines to the maxillaries make a suture in the shape of a "V" with the base forward and somewhat blunt. The canal for the palatine artery and nerve has a multiple opening on the palate. One major foramen opens on each side of the palatomaxillary suture, and two or possibly three smaller foramina open posteriorly on the palatine bone. Prominent on the palatine bone, posteromedial to the third molar, is[Pg 292] the foramen (palatine pit) for the palatine vein. Collectively, this complex of foramina is often known as the posterior palatine foramina. Wood (1933) states that H. gregoryi has two posterior palatine foramina as in Recent genera, the anterior one opening opposite the posterior end of M1, and the posterior one opposite the median part of M3. The orbital process of the left palatine bone lies inside (medial to) the palatine process of the maxillary. Anteriorly this orbital process meets the orbital process of the maxillary bone, and the sphenopalatine foramen is found in the suture between these two bones and the frontal.

As previously mentioned, the preserved dentition of this specimen consists of the complete left row of cheek teeth and roots of the incisors.

The incisor is compressed laterally, more so than in any Recent heteromyid. The anterior face is rounded, asulcate, and covered with a heavy band of enamel, whereas the posterior side, due to lateral compression, is drawn out into a thin blade. The root of the incisor is at the lateral border of the premaxillary, so it is obvious that the two incisors converged on each other at the midline to form a cutting surface. The writer has not examined the asulcate, laterally compressed incisors of H. hatcheri, and cannot say how they compare with this specimen.

The most significant features of the cheek teeth are their size, and the undivided internal cingulum. The molars are well worn, but the pattern, as a whole, is easily discernable.

P4 has an anterior cusp and three posterior cusps as in other members of the genus. However, the buccal cusp (metacone) of the metaloph is considerably anterior to the central (hypocone) and lingual (entostyle) cusps, and the three cusps do not form a curve as in other species. In size the central cusp is largest, the buccal cusp is practically as large, and the lingual cusp is small. A cingulum connects the lingual and central cusps at the posterior margin of the tooth. In the Pipestone Springs specimen of Heliscomys reported by McGrew (1941) the central and buccal cusps were connected by a cingulum, and some H. hatcheri specimens have all three cusps connected in a similar manner. A low arm or ridge extends from the lingual cusp forward to the lingual side of the base of the anterior cusp. The valleys between the posterior cusps are shallow. There is no sign of the small cuspule on the anteroexternal base of the anterior cusp seen in H. gregoryi, H. hatcheri, and the Pipestone Springs specimen. However, when one sees the variability of the cuspules on P4 of H. hatcheri, the presence of a minor cuspule does not seem to be of taxonomic importance.

M1 deviates from the pattern typical of Heliscomys more than do any of the other molar teeth. However, it must be kept in mind that some of the differences may be due to wear. For example, the protocone and paracone, and the hypocone and metacone are united to form protoloph and metaloph respectively. If the height of the external border of the paracone and metacone is taken into account and compared with the worn inner parts of these two cusps and the equally well-worn protocone and hypocone, it appears that these cusps formed no more of a true bilophodont tooth than do the cusps in other species of Heliscomys; in each of the species the cusps generally are separate entities. H. gregoryi is reported to have an "incipient tendency to form lophs,"[Pg 293] and H. hatcheri does the same when worn, but by union with the anterior cingulum. If cusps in H. tenuiceps do form lophs, the process is definitely not by union of the cusps with the anterior cingulum. The transverse median valley is deep and divides the tooth on the buccal side. The anteroposterior valleys are shallow and hanging, and can be said to exist only as indentations between the two sets of cusps. The paracone and metacone are much higher than the other two cusps, but much of this disparity in height may be the result of greater wear on the protocone and hypocone; H. gregoryi agrees with H. tenuiceps in these respects. Possibly the protocone and hypocone were much larger than the paracone and metacone. The internal cingulum of M1 exhibits only one large cusp opposite the medial end of the transverse valley, and shows no evidence of having been divided into two cusps. It is barely possible that there may have been two cusps and that wear makes it appear that there was only one. I doubt that there were two cusps because the cingulum is still so high (as high as the outer edges of the paracone and metacone) as to suggest that it is only slightly worn. Posteriorly this single cusp in the cingulum is united with the hypocone. Anteriorly the cusp is confluent with an anterior cingulum that is small, but, nevertheless, plainly visible as it crosses the occlusal face of the tooth to the paracone. There is some reason to believe that there was a posterior cingulum, but wear, which has obliterated even the posterior wall of the hypocone, prevents my being certain about this. This cingulum is absent in H. gregoryi and present in H. hatcheri.

M2 compares favorably with M1 except for the following differences: The protocone and hypocone are equal to the paracone and metacone in area, but not in height; although the internal cingulum is undivided, there is no evidence of a cusp as in M1. Here, too, the cingulum is as high as the paracone and metacone. Possibly the cingulum was confluent with the hypocone. The internal cingulum continues around the margin of the tooth to the paracone as an anterior cingulum which is sharper and plainer than the anterior cingulum on M1. There is no evidence of a posterior cingulum.

M3 shows a great amount of wear, and the occlusal pattern is not too clear. The median transverse valley is reduced almost to a pit, and the paracone and metacone are divided by a small notch. The protocone and paracone, the latter being much higher, are larger than the metacone which is reduced in size, and not all this difference in size can be the result of wear. The hypocone is absent. The internal cingulum is as high as the paracone and shows no evidence of division into two cusps, but in M3 this character is apparently variable for H. gregoryi does not have the internal cingulum divided and H. hatcheri has it markedly so. A slight anterior arm of the internal cingulum may have reached forward to the anterior face of the protocone. Wear prevents knowing whether a crest surrounds the tooth completely, or only on three sides.

In size the teeth of H. tenuiceps average twenty per cent larger than any of the upper teeth of H. gregoryi, H. hatcheri, or the Pipestone Springs specimen, and exceed any of the known lower teeth including those of H. vetus and H. senex by twenty-five per cent or more. Inasmuch as the upper teeth rarely exceed the lower in length in all the related genera of heteromyids, it is assumed that a similar relationship existed between the upper and lower molars[Pg 294] of H. tenuiceps and, therefore, that this species can be distinguished by its large size. The relative size of the premolars and molars is the same in H. tenuiceps as in other species of Heliscomys. However, within the framework of this similar relationship there are two differences. P4 of H. tenuiceps is relatively larger than the P4 of H. gregoryi, and relatively smaller than the P4 of H. hatcheri. The width of the molars is relatively greater in H. tenuiceps and H. gregoryi than in H. hatcheri.

Measurements

(In millimeters)

Discussion.—Heliscomys tenuiceps shows beyond any doubt that the heteromyid pattern of skull was developed by mid-Oligocene times, and in this species was already undergoing lateral compression. The major change later made in heteromyid skulls is broadening of the dorsal surface of the skull in the interorbital area.

The complete confirmation of Wood's (1939) statement that the "sciuromorph" zygomasseteric structure had been developed by this time in the heteromyid rodents as it had been in the early Eomyids is demonstrated in this specimen. Further, it is to be noted that the infraorbital canal is not sciuridlike, but has been forced forward on the rostrum, as in the Geomyoidea.

In some ways this skull shows similarities to Florentiamys loomisi Wood, of the early Miocene, which aid in determining the relationship of that unusual genus to Heliscomys and to the heteromyids in general. When Wood described Florentiamys the peculiar combination of characters found in this animal prompted him to speculate that: (1) It was a typical heteromyid which had secondarily developed[Pg 295] cingula; (2) its cheek teeth were nearer the primitive pattern than were those of any other known fossil heteromyid, and that Heliscomys represented a simplification in the reduction of the cingula; or (3) it was not a heteromyid, but a parallel development from the "Paramys" stock. Wood favored the second possibility. Now that a part of the skull of one species of Heliscomys is known, the undivided internal cingulum that is confluent with the hypocone, the lateral compression of the deep rostrum, and the general similarity to the heteromyids appear as points in common between the two skulls, and demonstrate the closeness of Florentiamys to the heteromyids. However, the specimen does not contribute anything new to use in choosing between Wood's first two postulates. In the writer's opinion the undivided internal cingulum is a primitive condition that has survived in Florentiamys and Heliscomys tenuiceps. This common character together with the laterally compressed rostrum leads me to think that structurally, H. tenuiceps is a link between Florentiamys and the ancestral form of Heliscomys. Admittedly P4 of Florentiamys seems far from the Heliscomys pattern, but I think that this highly specialized structure could have been derived from Heliscomys or a common ancestor.

LITERATURE CITED

1941. Heteromyids from the Miocene and Lower Oligocene. Geol. Ser. of Field Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 8, pp. 55-57, 1 fig.

1933. A New Heteromyid Rodent from the Oligocene of Montana. Jour. Mamm., vol. 14, pp. 134-141, 5 figs.

1935. Evolution and Relationship of the Heteromyid Rodents with New Forms from the Tertiary of Western North America. Annals of the Carnegie Mus., vol. 24, pp. 73-262, 157 figs.

1937. Part II. Rodentia, in The Mammalian Fauna of the White River Oligocene; by William Berryman Scott and Glenn Lowell Jepsen. Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc., n.s., vol. 28, pp. 155-269, figs. 8-70, pls. 23-33.

1939. Additional Specimens of the Heteromyid Rodent Heliscomys from the Oligocene of Nebraska. Amer. Jour. Sci., vol. 237, pp. 550-561, 11 figs.

Transmitted March 1, 1948.

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A NEW SPECIES OF HETEROMYID RODENT FROM THE MIDDLE OLIGOCENE OF NORTHEAST COLORADO WITH REMARKS ON THE SKULL ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”
• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.
• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the work.
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™

Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™, including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.

	U. K. M. N. H.
	(Vert. Paleo.)
	No. 7702
Height of skull at M2	7.48
Length from anterior end of nasals to rear of M3	15.41
Length of nasal bones	10.50
Width of rostrum at highest point of root canal	3.97
Interorbital width	4.39
Estimated length of skull	25.00
I, anteroposterior length	1.56
I, transverse width	0.63
P4-M3 crown length	3.75
P4-M3 alveolar length	3.80
P4, anteroposterior length[A]	1.05
P4, transverse width	1.08
M1, anteroposterior length	0.93
M1, transverse width	1.17
M2, anteroposterior length	0.93
M2, transverse width	1.14
M3, anteroposterior length	0.78
M3, transverse width	0.93

The Project Gutenberg eBook of A New Species of Heteromyid Rodent from the Middle Oligocene of Northeast Colorado with Remarks on the Skull

A New Species of Heteromyid Rodent from the Middle Oligocene of Northeast Colorado with Remarks on the Skull

BY

EDWIN C. GALBREATH

New Species of Heteromyid Rodent from the Middle Oligocene of Northeast Colorado with Remarks on the Skull

By

EDWIN C. GALBREATH

Family HETEROMYIDAE

Heliscomys tenuiceps, new species

Measurements

(In millimeters)

LITERATURE CITED

Transmitted March 1, 1948.

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE