Title: Index of the Project Gutenberg Works of Cornelius Tacitus
Author: Cornelius Tacitus
Editor: David Widger
Release date: June 20, 2019 [eBook #59786]
Most recently updated: July 7, 2019
Language: English
Credits: Produced by David Widger
|
## THE
GERMANY AND THE AGRICOLA ## THE REIGN OF TIBERIUS ## CONCERNING ORATORY ## TACITUS THE HISTORIES, Vols I and II ## ARGUMENTS OF CELSUS, PORPHYRY, AND JULIAN TACITUS ON GERMANY |
| INTRODUCTION. |
| A TREATISE ON THE SITUATION, MANNERS AND INHABITANTS OF GERMANY. [1] |
| THE LIFE OF CNAEUS JULIUS AGRICOLA. |
| FOOTNOTES: |
| A DIALOGUE CONCERNING ORATORY, OR THE CAUSES OF CORRUPT ELOQUENCE. |
| NOTES ON THE DIALOGUE CONCERNING ORATORY. |
| CONCLUSION. |
| GEOGRAPHICAL TABLE: |
| I. General introduction, with the reasons for writing an account of the following discourse. |
| II. The persons engaged in the dialogue; at first, Curiatius Maternus, Julius Secundus, and Marcus Aper. |
| III. Secundus endeavours to dissuade Maternus from thinking any more of dramatic composition. |
| IV. Maternus gives his reasons for persisting. |
| V. Aper condemns his resolution, and, in point of utility, real happiness, fame and dignity, contends that the oratorical profession is preferable to the poetical. |
| VIII. He cites the example of Eprius Marcellus and Crispus Vibius, who raised themselves by their eloquence to the highest honours. |
| IX. Poetical fame brings with it no advantage. |
| X. He exhorts Maternus to relinquish the muses, and devote his whole to eloquence and the business of the bar. |
| XI. Maternus defends his favourite studies; the pleasures arising from poetry are in their nature innocent and sublime; the fame is extensive and immortal. The poet enjoys the most delightful intercourse with his friends, whereas the life of the public orator is a state of warfare and anxiety. |
| XIV. Vipstanius Messala enters the room. He finds his friends engaged in a controversy, and being an admirer of ancient eloquence, he advises Aper to adopt the model of the ancients in preference to the plan of the modern rhetoricians. |
| XV. Hence a difference of opinion concerning the merit of the ancients and the moderns. Messala, Secundus, and Maternus, profess themselves admirers of the oratory that flourished in the time of the republic. Aper launches out against the ancients, and gives the preference to the advocates of his own time. He desires to know who are to be accounted ancients. |
| XVIII. Eloquence has various modes, all changing with the conjuncture of the times. But it is the nature of men to praise the past, and censure the present. The period when Cassius Severus flourished, is stated to be the point of time at which men cease to be ancients; Cassius with good reason deviated from the ancient manner. |
| XX. Defects of ancient eloquence: the modern style more refined and elegant. |
| XXI. The character of Calvus, Cælius, Cæsar and Brutus, and also of Asinius Pollio, and Messala Corvinus. |
| XXII. The praise and censure of Cicero. |
| XXIII. The true rhetorical art consists in blending the virtues of ancient oratory with the beauties of the modern style. |
| XXIV. Maternus observes that there can be no dispute about the superior reputation of the ancient orators: he therefore calls upon Messala to take that point for granted, and proceed to an enquiry into the causes that produced so great an alteration. |
| XXV. After some observations on the eloquence of Calvus, Asinius Pollio, Cæsar, Cicero, and others, Messala praises Gracchus and Lucius Crassus, but censures Mæcenas, Gallio, and Cassius Severus. |
| XXVII. Maternus reminds Messala of the true point in question; Messala proceeds to assign the causes which occasioned the decay of eloquence, such as the dissipation of the young men, the inattention of their parents, the ignorance of rhetorical professors, and the total neglect of ancient discipline. |
| XXXIV. He proceeds to explain the plan of study, and the institutions, customs, and various arts, by which orators were formed in the time of the republic. |
| XXXV. The defects and vices in the new system of education. In this part of the dialogue, the sequel of Messala's discourse is lost, with the whole of what was said by Secundus, and the beginning of Maternus: the supplement goes on from this place, distinguished by inverted commas [transcriber's note: not used], and the sections marked with numerical figures. |
| 1. Messala describes the presumption of the young advocates on their first appearance at the bar; their want of legal knowledge, and the absurd habits which they contracted in the schools of the rhetoricians. |
| 2. Eloquence totally ruined by the preceptors. Messala concludes with desiring Secundus and Maternus to assign the reasons which have occurred to them. |
| 4. Secundus gives his opinion. The change of government produced a new mode of eloquence. The orators under the emperors endeavoured to be ingenious rather than natural. Seneca the first who introduced a false taste, which still prevailed in the reign of Vespasian. |
| 8. Licinius Largus taught the advocates of his time the disgraceful art of hiring applauders by profession. This was the bane of all true oratory, and, for that reason, Maternus was right in renouncing the forum altogether. |
| 10. Maternus acknowledges that he was disgusted by the shameful practices that prevailed at the bar, and therefore resolved to devote the rest of his time to poetry and the muses. |
| 11. An apology for the rhetoricians. The praise of Quintilian. True eloquence died with Cicero. |
| 13. The loss of liberty was the ruin of genuine oratory. Demosthenes flourished under a free government. The original goes on from this place to the end of the dialogue. |
| XXXVI. Eloquence flourishes most in times of public tumult. The crimes of turbulent citizens supply the orator with his best materials. |
| XXXVII. In the time of the republic, oratorical talents were necessary qualifications, and without them no man was deemed worthy of being advanced to the magistracy. |
| XXXVIII. The Roman orators were not confined in point of time; they might extend their speeches to what length they thought proper, and could even adjourn. Pompey abridged the liberty of speech, and limited the time. |
| XXXIX. The very dress of the advocates under the emperors was prejudicial to eloquence. |
| XL. True eloquence springs from the vices of men, and never was known to exist under a calm and settled government. |
| XLI. Eloquence changes with the times. Every age has its own peculiar advantages, and invidious comparisons are unnecessary. |
| XLII. Conclusion of the dialogue. |
| Celsus |
| Porphyry |
| Julian |